Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Midweek Musical Mental Moment


Blog Update:

Upgrading the human operating system and will resume regular posting shortly. 

Upcoming blog posts will include: entries in the series on technology in Latin America focusing on Brazil and Mexico; entries in the series on critical techno-cultural competency; and blog posts on 3D printing, Google Glass project, and survey topics in transhumanism. 

Stay tuned. 

Until then, here is a midweek musical mental moment. 

Three songs that have interesting (re: ridiculous) stylistic and temporal relationships. 

Band of Horses: "Dilly"


This is an upbeat pop track with a cool late 1970s early 1980s sheen, reminiscent, for some odd reason, to television shows and early BIlly Joel tracks of the same period (here they are one-and-the-same).

The high point of "Dilly" is a perfect pop chorus: 

"It really took a tall one to see it
Two to believe it
Three to just get in the way"




The pop guitars and staccato piano accents on "Dilly" harken back to two classic television series theme songs from the early 1980s: Greatest American Hero ("Believe It or Not") and Bosom Buddies ("My Life"). 

Greatest American Hero: A teacher becomes a superhero using a special alien space suit that contains powers he can barely understand or control (enter laugh track). He is aided by a government agent and his lawyer girlfriend. Right wrongs, control the suit, & find love.  

Bosom Buddies: Two ad-creative types feel the rent-crunch of the big city (even then, "the rent was too damn high!"), so these two jovial rogues cross-dress in order to live in an all-female apartment complex...hilarity ensues...ah...the kinder gentler days of Reaganomics.

Greatest American Hero: "Believe It or Not" 



Bosom Buddies: "My Life"



Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Toward a Critical Techno-Cultural Competency: Part 3 of Solve for X


This blog post is Part 3 in a running blog theme where I use theories of cultural competency in healthcare to investigate the development of techno-human identities. The purpose here is to explore how concepts of cultural competency can help inform our understanding of how technology interacts with identity and self-concept. These posts operate as a forum to wrestle with these ideas in an effort to gain deeper understandings of techno-human experiences. Also, it is good fun. Click here for Part 1 and 2.

In their text, Multicultural Health, Ritter & Hoffman explored how using multicultural (or intercultural) approaches to healthcare might positively impact life outcomes, disease/illness rates, and promote greater social equity.  

A desire to better understand the nuances of different cultures lies at the heart of this discussion. Culture is dynamic and fluid. Identities are multiple, fractured, and complex. It can be argued that culture affects/interacts/informs our perceptions of health and illness, beliefs about why/how illness occurs, health behaviors, how symptoms are described and how concerns are expressed, and how treatment is pursued and adhered. We proceed here upon the assumption that culture is learned, changes over time, and is passed from generation to generation; is complex, and many subcultures exist within a dominant culture; and a person may belong to numerous subcultures.

These statements become very interesting when we substitute the word culture with technology.

We proceed here upon the assumption that technology is learned, changes over time, and is passed from generation to generation; is complex, and many techno-subcultures exist within a dominant culture; and a given person may belong to numerous techno-subcultures (or have layered techno-identities).

The goals/attributes of a multicultural approach to health care include purposeful, directed actions:
  • To provide health services in a culturally sensitive, knowledgeable, and nonjudgmental manner
  • To challenge one’s own cultural assumptions and ask critical questions
  • To integrate different approaches to care
  • To recognize the culture of the recipient while providing care in accordance with the legal/ethical norms and the medically sound practices of the practitioner’s medical system (this last is a key point)

Let’s try it again; this time we substitute the word health or care with technology.
  • To provide technology services in a culturally sensitive, knowledgeable, and nonjudgmental manner
  • To challenge one’s own technological assumptions and ask critical questions
  • To integrate different approaches to technology
  • To recognize the culture (technology) of the recipient while providing technology in accordance with the legal/ethical norms and the scientifically sound practices of the practitioner’s technology system(s)

Cultural adaptation (or acculturation) is a critical component in understanding multicultural health. Summarized, cultural adaptation here is the degree to which a person has adapted to the dominant culture while retaining traditional practices; occurs on a spectrum between immersion in the dominant culture and immersion in a native culture; and where high levels of acculturation can have positive health benefits, yet some health-positive aspects of traditional culture (and by extension identitiy) may also be lost in the process.

Four main quadrants comprise this construction:
  • Assimilated: move away from culture of origin immersing into dominant society
  • Integrated: immersion in both ethnic and dominant society
  • Marginal: considered most difficult, not accepted (integrated) by culture of origin or dominant society
  • Separated: withdraws from dominant society and is immersed in ethnic society

In multicultural health research, integrated is often considered the most healthy adaptation style.

For kicks, these principles can be applied to techno-human/human-techno integration on a spectrum of "full" AI to “raw” human in either direction.   
  • Assimilated: move away from culture of origin immersing into “other” society
  • Integrated: immersion in both human and robotic societies
  • Marginal: considered most difficult, not accepted by culture of origin or “other” society
  • Separated: withdraw from dominant society and immersed in human only or robotic only society

This is the fun bit. Create your own. 

Future Past Histories: The Visioneers, Gerard O'Neill, & Eric Drexler

"At every crossway on the road that leads to the future, each progressive spirit is opposed by a thousand men appointed to guard the past. Let us have no fear lest the fair towers of former days be sufficiently defended. The least that the most timid among us can do is not to add to the immense dead weight which nature drags along.” 

-- Count Maurice Maeterlinck (1862-1949 Belgium poet, dramatist, essayist - Nobel Prize winner for literature 1911): Our Social Duty 





The San Jose Tech Museum’s monthly lecture series recently featured UCSB Professor of History W. Patrick McCrays presentation based on his science history, The Visioneers: How a Group of Elite Scientists Pursued Space Colonies, Nanotechnologies, and a Limitless Future.

This story is as important as it is outlandish.

To the speaker first, then the narrative. McCray’s engaging, highly informed style was the perfect pitch tone to convey the stories of Princeton physicist Gerard K. O’Neill and MIT-trained engineer K. Eric Drexler and their expansive, yet often divergent ideas, about future-technologies and limits on science.

McCray relays a science history, which in-of-itself is awesome, yet where McCray excels is by texturing the lives of these two futurists within the larger sociocultural, economic, and political environments in which they operated. Here is a larger-than-earth narrative, (as Paul Saffo, managing director, Discern, wrote so eloquently about McCray’s book), about visionaries who fought against “the gravity of habit and convention.”

A thousand men indeed.

The narrative begins in the early 1960s with Gerard O’Neill’s futurism and space expansion theories. The story is connected to the birth and growth of nanotechnologies and Eric Drexler in the 1990s, and concludes with the explosion of technologies in the early part of the 21st century…all the while crisscrossing through U.S. popular cultural, political, and economic histories.

“Ballast exists everywhere; all the pebbles of the harbor, all the sand of the beach, will serve for that. But sails are rare and precious things; their place is not in the murk of the well, but amid the light of the tall masts, where they will collect the winds of space.”

-- Count Maurice Maeterlinck

There are striking similarities and differences between the stories of these two futurists who had the ability to generate interest and mobilize supporters, hunt down funding and grants from unconventional sources, engage popular imagination and discourse, produce hard science, and navigate political and legislative bodies, while jutting up against the walls of forbidden science. These were futurists who extrapolated (in many cases in very concrete ways) what was possible in near future (the next 15-20 years).

It is a story about science, the human experience, fame, money, counterculture, libertarianism, future technologies, space, politics, legislation, academe, economics, and the very root and meanings of life.

This is a contested terrain. McCray astutely stated in his lecture: “The future is a politically contested space.”

The Short Story: Enter Gerard K. O’Neill (trained physicist, early futurist), who has the vision and the technical skills to conceive of space colonies and some of the apparatus needed to support life in space. His work coincides with the development of eco-catastrophism narratives expressed in film, TV, and science fiction of the 1960s and 1970s. This coincided with the release of Limits to Growth (1972) authored by Donella H. Meadows, Dennis L. Meadows, Jørgen Randers, and William W. Behrens III. Computational modeling was used to explore how exponential growth interacted with finite resources. The theory and data analysis picked up social steam with the growth of the eco-movement, and were punctuated by the oil shortages that occurred in the US in the 1970s.

Some critics of the constraints of the limits theory countered that it coded for maintenance of the status quo. O’Neill and his comrades responded to the controls of the finite with a focus on the infinite….space…the colonization and humanization of space.

In the 1970s, O’Neill takes the space colonization vision public, drumming-up support on a variety of stages. He publishes an article in Physics Today in 1974; participates in a 1976 penthouse interview; publishes a book, The High Frontier, in 1976; and approaches policy makers and legislators in 1978.

This spurred a social movement which hit its high point with the development of the L5 society, which had slogans that wouldn’t look at out-of-place at a Singularity Summit. Not surprisingly, McCray relayed in his lecture that locations that had robust technology or aerospace infrastructures supported these burgeoning groups. Places like Silicon Valley, which served as an idealized backdrop for one of O’Neill’s space colony projections.

Here is a recent rendering of O’Neill’s space colony vision rendered in modern graphics (Terasem 02 O'Neill Space Colony). 



McCray examined the projected costs of O’Neill’s projects, considering costs of other outlandish building projects of the 1970s, and finds that ONeill’s estimates were not in the realm of science fiction.

Aspects of the social Left cast a skeptical eye toward the space exploration vision, seeing growth into space as an extension of the military industrial complex. Here is an interesting article from the Atlantic on oppostion to Apollo. Others, such as Timothy Leary, drew from a different well; espousing nascent ideas about life extension and the limits of human consciousness…here we see some early examples of transhumanism.

For the second part of this incredible science history, go here, and join me in thinking about the challenges we face when we gaze ever-up and ever-forward.

Postscript: This lecture and book generated so many critical questions and thoughts. Anachronistic as it might be, consider how different these stories would have been without the Cold War. If these stories had occurred during an era of open-access science…how much more might we have explored without the guardians of habit and routine…and what of my own guardianship? Learning about the early stories of techno-science is especially resonant for me as native of Silicon Valley. These stories hold local, national, and global significance, yet remain intensely personal.

Sunday, February 17, 2013

Music Break

Here are a few bands for your listening and viewing pleasure. I have pulled these videos from the video link on the site, as the video link will no longer be a part of site navigation. Rather than delete these videos into the youtube soup, I have reposted the videos here. Look for more music video posts each Sunday to help you mentally prepare for the week ahead.

Each group below offers fresh ideas in the modern music scene. I have provided background information and links to each. Dig in.

Department of Eagles: "No One Does it Like You" - This track is perfection. Reminiscent of old 1920s ballads while remaining rooted in indie traditions. 




Band Home Page: http://www.departmentofeagles.com/


Bio: "Department of Eagles began in 2000, when New York University assigned freshmen Fred Nicolaus and Daniel Rossen to share a room. To pass the time during an uneventful spring semester, the two began making music together, collecting samples and turning them into songs using pirated software and a microphone borrowed from their neighbor Chris Taylor (who, years later, would become Daniel's bandmate in Grizzly Bear and DoE's producer/engineer). Somewhat accidentally the group was discovered by a California label and the material recorded in this period was combined with later studio sessions to form Department of Eagles' 2003 debut, The Cold Nose. It gained a small but enthusiastic audience and was praised by critics from the San Francisco Bay Guardian to the London Times."

Grizzly Bear: "Ready, Able" : This etherial track hits many interesting themes. Reminiscent of Jens Leckman, Daniel Rossens' open vocal style reverberates through the open chords of the guitar. At once melancholy and hopeful.




Band Home Page: http://grizzly-bear.net/about/

Bio: "Grizzly Bear began as a moniker for songwriter Ed Droste's music in the early 2000s.
In 2004, Droste released Grizzly Bear's debut album, Horn of Plenty. Predominately a solo album the album featured contributions from future drummer Christopher Bear. Rolling Stone magazine wrote of the first album that "The pure atmospheric power of the songs is more than enough to hypnotize." Droste and Bear were subsequently joined by bass guitarist and producer Chris Taylor, and performed four shows together as a three-piece."

OK GO: "This Too Will Pass": Great pop song, an anthemic call to take it all in stride. This song stands out for the one-take Rube Goldberg machine that syncs in-time with the musical cues. This video is like pop music meets MythBusters crossed with PBS's 1980s cult science show 3-2-1 Contact.





Version 2





Band Home Page: http://okgo.net/

Wiki Bio: "An American alternative rock band originally from Chicago, Illinois, but now residing in Los Angeles, California. The band is composed of Damian Kulash (lead vocals, guitar), Tim Nordwind (bass guitar and vocals), Dan Konopka (drums and percussion) and Andy Ross (guitar, keyboards and vocals), who joined them in 2005, replacing Andy Duncan. They are perhaps best known for their often elaborate and quirky music videos."

"The original members formed as OK Go in 1998 and released two studio albums before Duncan's departure. The band's video for "Here It Goes Again" won a Grammy Award for "Best Short-Form Music Video" in 2007."

Timber Timbre: "Bad Ritual": This band artfully recalls the blues madness of Screamin' Jay Hawkins... a creepy cacophony of folk, roots, ballads, indie, and horror music.






Band Home Page: http://www.timbertimbre.com/

Wiki Bio: "A Canadian folk music project, featuring Taylor Kirk, Simon Trottier and Mika Posen. The moniker refers to an early series of recordings made in a timber-framed cabin set in the wooded outskirts of Bobcaygeon, Ontario."

"Timber Timbre released two albums independently before releasing a self-titled album on Out of This Spark in January 2009. They were subsequently signed to Arts & Crafts, who re-released the album on June 30 in Canada and July 28 internationally.[1] The album was named as a longlist nominee for the 2009 Polaris Music Prize on June 15, 2009,[2] and was deemed album of the year by Eye Weekly."

"The band's song "Magic Arrow" was featured in the television show Breaking Bad, in the episode "Caballo Sin Nombre", as well as in the TV series The Good Wife, in the episode "Bitcoin for Dummies". "Black Water" features on the soundtrack for the 2012 comedy, For a Good Time, Call... "

"On June 16, 2011, the band's fourth album Creep On Creepin' On was named as a longlisted nominee for the 2011 Polaris Music Prize. On July 6, the album was named as a short listed (one of ten) nominee for the 2011 award."

Vadoinmessico: "Pond": Thick rhythms lay at the heart of Vadoimessico's sound (loosely translates to "I go to Mexico"). Great blend of soca, ska, indie, Spanish folk, and shoe-gaze. This band remains under the radar in the US, but demand a deeper listen.







Band Home Page: https://soundcloud.com/vadoinmessico

SoundCloud Bio: "Vadoinmessico are a 5 piece band from several corners of the Earth residing in London and playing beautiful, nostalgic psychedelic freak-folk. Giorgio (from Italy), Salvador (from Mexico) started the band and were soon joined by banjo player Stefan (from Austria) and Alessandro (also Italian), and their English drummer Joe."

Paving Cultural Paths: Introducing Techno-Future Narratives & Future Shock


In a recent post on IEET, The Institute of Ethics and Emerging Technologies, Adam Ford, discussed some of the nuances of writing for, and presenting to, audiences who have no previous experiences with future narratives

Ford wrote about the concept of future shock, when audiences respond to techno-future narratives with a range of intense negative responses often punctuated by denial or condemnation. 

(Video:George Dvorksy - Covering the Future Beat: Managing Futureshock when Writing for a Mass Audience)



Future shock (like a techno-information-narrative overload) often hits the uninitiated at the very core of their self-concepts. I see this in students when I lecture on techno-human narratives. A captive audience, for many students those lectures are a trip into the fantastic and inconceivable; a few are excited, a few more are flabbergasted, even more are confused (I hope not due to my skills as an orator!). The narratives are so foreign, as if dropped-off from another planet, to be rendered in CGI-3D in a movie yet to be made in future-time by the all-powerful Walt-Lucas-Disney-Arts superbrain. 

Incidentally, the concept of future shock was explored in a novel of the same name written by the futurist Alvin Toffler in 1970. Toffler defined the term "future shock" as a certain psychological state of individuals and entire societies who experience "too much change in too short a period of time". Curtis Mayfield recorded a song called "Future Shock" on the album "Back to the World" that would be covered in 1983 by Herbie Hancock as the title track for Future Shock



Ford wrote, “Ultimately, the goal for writers covering the future beat should not be persuasion, but rather the matter-of-fact dissemination of all relevant information, accompanied by supplementary analysis and interpretation from the experts.” 

Yes, information and facts are critical, as are folks who have honed critical techno-cultural competencies (read more here) to help engage and encourage social discourse. Certainly though, the techno-future narrative is a global discussion and one that will intimately affect communities in the developing world.

One of the most effective channels to explore transhumanist narratives, the Singularity, and emerging techno-human interfaces is through education. And at public institutions at that. The students at public universities (mainly poor, working class, and middle class, minority students) often represent a diverse cross-section of life, people whose lives will be affected directly as technology integrates deeper into the social and bio-ecological human experience. The continued integration of the organic with the mechanic will have significant impacts on poor and working class peoples, most visibly in economics, employment, environment, and health outcomes.

To be sure, there will be a dizzying array of DIY cyborg modification by persons in impoverished communities, especially in the developing world.

People need work. People need to eat. People are creative.

Reverse engineering discarded robots, fixing them up as DIY techno-exoskeletons in order to work alongside robots in agriculture or mining (incidentally, will robots develop labor unions?). Local craftsmen switching from traditional labor toward techno-DIY repair shops to service the transformed local economies. Local artists might integrate techno-human-robotic narratives into art, music, and story.

Expressions of the Singularity, cyborgification, and artificial intelligence will be explosively evidenced in developing world communities.

In reference to the creation and proliferation of techno-futurists narratives, Ford wrote, “The aim is to encourage refined communication about the future in creative ways, and thereby promote serious attention to the opportunities and risks we are facing.”

One effective strategy is to employ humor when discussing techno-future narratives. Not so ironically, using humor humanizes the strangeness of techno-human narratives. In my lectures, I encourage students to laugh when thinking about what might seem absurd outcomes or possibilities: net result – poking fun at the intensity of techno-narrative allows audiences a bit of distance…distance enough to weigh their values, beliefs, and identities in light of this new hilarious, but highly plausible and though-provoking, idea: We are always changing.

Friday, February 15, 2013

Campos del Cambio: Technology in Latin America


[Note to Reader: This is the first blog post in a running theme-blog series examining technology in Latin America. This topic is important on a personal and professional level; having lived in Central America and studied Latin American cultures, I feel connected to the region. As a techno-humanist (whatever that means), I believe in open access…in the purposeful creation, production, and proliferation of technologies as a means to achieve greater social equity, as a means to improve living standards and quality of life; as a means to more fully express sociocultural life.]

Technology must expand in Latin America and the world needs Latin American technological innovation.

In Latin America is housed an audacious heterogeneity of life. This is a region where complex economic, social, political, and environmental issues are problematized by pressing concerns of human rights and social justice.

Shifting Demographics. 
The traditional view of Latin American demographics paints a region of high birth rates, extended familial groups, and youth-heavy populations. Things are changing. The region is undergoing dramatic shifts in birth rates, in population concentration and densities, in political systems, and in levels of industrial and economic infrastructural growth.

Riordan Roett (Sarita and Don Johnston Professor and director of Western Hemisphere Studies at John Hopkins University) wrote, “Fertility rates—the average number of lifetime births per woman—have fallen dramatically over the last 30 years. They are now near, at or even beneath the 2.1 replacement rate—the fertility rate needed to maintain a stable population from one generation to the next one—in most countries. At the same time, life expectancy has sharply increased and is fast approaching developed-world levels. The result will be a dramatic slowdown in population growth and an equally dramatic aging trend.”

In the face of conventional thought, based on projected growth, it is hypothesized that significant nation-states in Latin America (Brazil, Chile, & Mexico) will have majority older populations by 2050, exceeding numbers in the United States. This is significant because these three countries have the most advanced technological infrastructures in the region.

Contrast these data with World Bank reports that, “LAC’s growth performance in the last 50 years is one of the world’s lowest and the region’s per capita income is only 30% that of the US. However a mix of unprecedented growth and economic stability over the past decade pulled 74 million people out of poverty and helped close the inequality gap in LAC. The region has also seen the rise of its middle class. In spite of the global financial crisis the region remained stable. Overall, LAC economies will need to adapt to the changing global circumstances to remain competitive and continue growing at a solid pace. Boosting productivity and innovation are essential.”

These are challenging prospects, yet supporting bottom-up, grass-roots techno-growth, as seen in the burgeoning markets in Brazil, will go a long way in spurring innovation.

The macro-infrastructural challenges in LA are significant. Boosting technological productivity and innovation will have to occur on a number of levels. The standard players are involved: home nation and foreign governments, academia, private industry groups, media makers, and NGOs. Maybe though, conventional wisdom here, much like demographics, serves as a poor guide.

As noted above, a targeted, grass-roots approach that focuses on organic development of technology at the local level (via projects such as community incubators, start-up funding, university competitions and prizes, and partnerships with SMEs)…in cities with stable(ish) socioeconomic infrastructural development where technological growth is tailored by participants in those cities to meet the unique needs of the inhabitants of those cities and surrounding geographies.

Fundamental shifts in familial structures, ecology concerns, drug wars, human rights issues, major geographic logistics issues, organized crime growth, sustainability issues, uncertain banking systems, and volatile political climates problematize the growth of technology in Latin America.

The region’s more robust economies (Brazil, Chile, Columbia, and Mexico) will continue to play critical roles in the nascent development of technology. Future posts will explore each of these nation’s techno-socioeconomic situations.

Adaptation is a skill often driven by necessity. Imagine if the wide-ranging cultural creative expressions in Latin American (as seen in music, art, film, and sport) could be channeled and expressed in the development of technologies.

The world needs Latin American technological innovation


Research. 
Detailed reports on technology in the region can be found at FIRST: “A Support Action funded by the European Commission Seventh Framework Programme in order to foster International Cooperation in the areas of Future Internet and ICT Components and systems between Europe and Latin America.”

Latin America Open Government Partnership
Latin American Demographic Changes
Latin American Environmental Concerns
Financial Development in LA and Caribbean
Data Centers in LAC
State of Finance in LAC
Socioeconomic Database Latin America
SEO in Latin America
UNEP Reports

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Towards a Critical Techno-Cultural Competency: Part 2 of Solve for X

Note to Reader: This post is Part 2 of Solve for X, a running blog post theme on adopting (poorly) theories from critical cultural studies, health studies, social psychology, and sociology to explore techno-culture. Part I can be found here.   

Critical Techno-Cultural Competency: A loaded academic turn of phrase to be sure. What does it mean…if anything? Our task here is to begin to configure this puzzle. 

Now we could spend an inordinate amount of time debating definitions, yet I am leaning here on the latitude of the blog format. Let's not get so caught up in the defining that we neglect to do the doing. Yet a foundation this house of theoretical cards needs.

Critical. The tertiary definition fits our needs best: exercising or involving careful judgment or judicious evaluation.

Technology. If this seems far too simplistic, blame the folks at Oxford Dictionary. The application of scientific knowledge for practical purposes, esp. in industry: "computer technology"; "recycling technologies"; Machinery and equipment developed from such scientific knowledge.

Culture. Take a spin here and marvel at the many (many) definitions. Here is the short form: the integrated pattern of human knowledge, belief, and behavior that depends upon the capacity for learning and transmitting knowledge to succeeding generations; the customary beliefs, social forms, and material traits of a group.

Competence. Here again the third node captures the heart of the matter: the knowledge that enables a person to speak and understand a language.

A critical techno-cultural competency then…(deep breath)…is the knowledge and skill that enables a person to “speak” and understand techno-languages, while exercising careful judgment and engaging in judicious evaluation of the application of scientific knowledge for various purposes (including machinery and equipment from such scientific knowledge), as integrated into the knowledge, beliefs, behaviors, social forms, and material traits of human groups.  

These notions can be applied to both technology producers and consumers; in fact, in some ways, under these auspices, they are one in the same.

[Reader: Take a stab at it and post your version in the comments section below. This is a noun string nightmare. The winning entrant’s phrase will appear in my research methods writing course for the pain and amusement of undergraduate student minds – more likely pain than amusement.

As to the "why this matters" bit? Short answer: The development and deployment of critical techno-cultural competencies might mean technologies that more seamlessly integrate, in positive beneficial ways, into the lives of users…improving life and health outcomes…enriching culture through techno-social interconnection…or at least help us stride a wee bit closer toward those shifting goal posts. First and foremost in this task is to help incubate environments that will grow technologies in the developing world, with a directed goal toward transforming the lives of those who do so much of the heavy lifting of globalization.  Enter your favorite Transhumanist narratives here.  

So the question is not: “Do you speak tech?”

The question is: “Which dialects of tech do you speak?”

So many critical questions cascade in its wake. 
  • Who, when, where, and how do you speak those techno-dialects?
  • How does that influence your relationships with technologies?
  • How does this weave into your traditional identity lines including race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, religious affiliations, geographic environmental experiences, and sub-cultural affiliations? 
In Part 3, we will continue to explore these questions and the critical cultural studies concepts of assimilation, acculturation, marginalization, and separation in terms of techno-human integration or the importance of a proper whiskey in the writing process. 

Sunday, February 10, 2013

Musical Time Machine: The Band & Dr. Dog

Music connects time, place, memory, emotion, and sound. It marks, punctuates, and accents the many macro and micro moments of our lives. When the music itself is built out of musical histories and genres, it makes the marks on our lives all the more indelible. 


A select few bands are able to capture all of that simultaneously. Time, Place, Memory, Emotion,   Sound.

When musicians weave these influences while penning something new and fresh...we are in precious territory.

For Consideration: The Band and Dr. Dog. Two groups that artfully weave folk, gospel, rock, pop, ballad, funk, soul, country, roots, and eclectica.

Here then for your listening pleasure is a video one-two punch from two important groups with noted similarities that straddle American musical genres, linking us to something bigger and deeper than self, while acknowledging the place of the individual in the social collective human experience.

The Band: Detailed information can be found here

Brief Wiki Bio: "The Band was a Canadian-American roots rock group that originally consisted of Rick Danko (bass guitar, double bass, fiddle, trombone, vocals), Levon Helm (drums, mandolin, guitar, vocals), Garth Hudson (keyboard instruments, saxophones, trumpet), Richard Manuel (piano, drums, baritone saxophone, vocals) and Robbie Robertson (guitar, vocals). The members of the Band first came together as they joined rockabilly singer Ronnie Hawkins's backing group, The Hawks, one by one between 1958 and 1963."

"In 1964, they separated from Hawkins, after which they toured and released a few singles as Levon and the Hawks and the Canadian Squires. The next year, Bob Dylan hired them for his U.S. tour in 1965 and world tour in 1966.[1] Following the 1966 tour, the group moved with Dylan to Saugerties, New York, where they made the informal 1967 recordings that became The Basement Tapes, which forged the basis for their 1968 debut album Music from Big Pink. Because they were always "the band" to various frontmen, Helm said the name "The Band" worked well when the group came into its own.[2][N 1] The group began performing officially as The Band in 1968, and went on to release ten studio albums. Dylan continued to collaborate with The Band over the course of their career, including a joint 1974 tour."

"The original configuration of The Band ended its touring career in 1976 with an elaborate live ballroom performance featuring numerous musical celebrities. This performance was immortalized in Martin Scorsese's 1978 documentary The Last Waltz." (Wiki, 2013).

The Band: Big Pink

Dr. Dog: Detailed information here. 

Brief Wiki Bio: "Dr. Dog is an indie rock band from West Grove, Pennsylvania.[1] Its lineup consists of Toby Leaman (bass guitar), Scott McMicken (lead guitar), Frank McElroy (rhythm guitar), Zach Miller (keyboard), andEric Slick (drums). Lead vocal duties are shared between Leaman and McMicken, with all members contributing harmonies. In addition, each band member has a nickname, and they have explained that friends of the band also receive nicknames, which are drawn from aspects of their lives and personalities (Former member Andrew "Trial" Jones, for example, is a licensed attorney).[2]"

"The band's unique version of indie rock is strongly influenced by bands of the 1960s. Their earlier recordings show influence of the lo-fi sound and pop sensibilities of indie rock bands of the 1990s, such as Guided By Voices and Pavement.[3] Recent albums have featured more polished production" (Wiki, 2013).

Dr. Dog: Fate



Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Help Me Obi-Watch Konobi, You are My Only Device: SmartWatches and Accessory Tech


The song remains the same, with a new back beat. In elementary school, calculator watches were the bee’s knees…”you can play Pacman on that!” was the common refrain.

The growth of smartphones has led to the decline in many things, watches among the list of causalities. A mainstay of 20th century fashion, watches are now rarely seen on the below-30 set; witness the hundreds of students who pass through my classrooms each year.

Retro is as retro does. The growth of smart-rings has inevitably led to a rethink on watches, with a number of interesting offerings hitting the market. Here is a roundup of the top entrants at CES 2013.

The classic scene from Star Wars where Leia records a message on R2D2 is no longer a flight of fancy. Imagine a watch that can display 3D visuals from an aperture. The ability to record audio and visual; a decent mic will be necessity or we will all look like secret service agents talking into our wrists.
  • Watches with SD cards that can be transferred to mobile devices
  • Watches that act as mobile hotspots
  • Watches that provide GPS that links to mobile devices
  • Watches that give speech reminders of events, calendars, text updates, tweets, & voicemails.
  • Watches that interact with a person’s biological functions, sending signals to embed tech inside the body which can influence psychophysiology
  • Watches that act as USB charging ports
  • Watches that boost processing power of mobile devices
  • Watches that allow for quick scans on public transportation
  • Watches that hold important (protected, encrypted) medical information of victims for first responders
  • Watches that beam 3D image overlays with scrolling information about the environment
  • Watches that track health and fitness

A wearable Google watch that interacts with Google Glasses and a Nexus 7… iCyborg, ready to travel the multiverse.

Watch-tech, is of course, only the beginning. Belts that read bio-information. Jackets that regulate heat. Glasses that do…well everything. The medical implications on better care and quicker responses are enormous. Eventually we will be able to overlay thin bio-techno films on our bodies that will influence human functioning in dramatic ways.

As with all technology, issues of scalability, flexibility, cost, legality, and environmental impact will influence the growth of wearable tech.   

Here is a roundup of Mashable articles on wearable tech that provide a few glimpses into the future/now of wearable technologies.

Tuesday, February 5, 2013

Cultural Competency in Technology Practice

The growth of biosocial medicinal approaches to care has prompted many in the allied health industries to rethink the importance of cultural identities in life outcomes. The Office of Minority Health stated that "Cultural and linguistic competence is a set of congruent behaviors, attitudes, and policies that come together in a system, agency, or among professionals that enables effective work in cross-cultural situations."

The parallels with technology industries and practices are considerable and demand greater attention.

We can apply the ideas of cultural competency in health into technology practice. The purpose of this entry is to develop some critical questions about how cultural competency may affect technology practice, consumption, production, and participation.
  1. What are the cultural and linguistic competencies that companies need to develop to better understand the cultural needs of how users interact with technology products? 
  2. What are the cultural and linguistic competencies that different technology users bring with them when they interact with technology? 
  3. What are the behaviors and attitudes cultural groups have about technology and technology practice?
  4. Will providing more targeted, cultural-based technology experiences to users mean higher user satisfaction, greater buy-in, greater use, and greater economic consumption?
  5. What differences do we see between culture groups' usages of technology, and how much of this difference can be attributed to cultural values and beliefs? 

Over the course of the next few months, I will explore these ideas in more detail, drawing examples from technology industries. The goal here is to examine how different cultures use technology, and how that usage is influenced by sociocultural and socioeconomic values/identities. 

Cultural identities play a huge part in life experiences. It is no stretch then to theorize that cultural identities play a role in technology. 

A surface Google search using the search terms "cultural competency and technology" elicited mainly health related content, which means we might have an interesting, previously unexplored, space.  Excellent.

It may be that the infusion of cultural competency in technology practice will enhance ROI for both producers and consumers.       

A quick and dirty primer for those interested in reading more: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cultural_competence

A succinct overview can also be found at the Office of Minority Health: http://minorityhealth.hhs.gov/templates/browse.aspx?lvl=2&lvlID=11

National Center for Cultural Competency: http://nccc.georgetown.edu/